Chiefs Owner Thinks Controversial Rule Will Be Reviewed

No one can say with 100% certainty that the Cleveland Browns would have won the AFC divisional playoff game against the Kansas City Chiefs if the Rashard Higgins fumble had not happened.

What they can say is that play impacted the flow and momentum of the game.

It also caused a 10 point swing in favor of the Chiefs.

The Browns were in the red zone about to score a touchdown, and after the rule was implemented the Chiefs scored a field goal.

In an interview with Chris “Mad Dog” Russo of SiriusXM Mad Dog Radio, Chiefs owner Clark Hunt talked about the play.

He said:

“I do think the Competition Committee will look at that rule this year. A lot of times it takes a catalyst play in an important game for the Competition Committee to dig in and think about changing a rule that’s been around for a long time. And certainly that play hurt the Browns, helped the Chiefs, had an impact on the course of the game so I do think there’s a good chance it’ll be looked at. I don’t know where the Committee will come down but I can see arguments on both sides.”

 

The Play

Rashard Higgins' fumble led to discussions regarding the NFL's touchback and helmet-to-helmet rules https://t.co/8NMHtzfBVX

— Tony Cleveland (@Tony_Cleveland) January 18, 2021

Before we talk about the rule, let’s just get one thing out of the way.

The helmet-to-helmet penalty should have been called.

Perhaps this rule would not be under so much scrutiny if that happened.

The Rule

Because Higgins fumbled the ball before going into the end zone, it was considered a touchback so the Chiefs got the ball on the Browns 25 yard line.

To be fair, Browns fans were not the only ones outraged by this rule.

there are two kinds of people: those who hate the fumble touchback rule and people who are wrong

— Mina Kimes (@minakimes) January 17, 2021

Washington Football Team’s defensive coordinator Jack Del Rio also took to Twitter immediately to express his disgust with the rule.

It is way past time to fix that outdated rule. Just doesn’t make sense, the punishment is too severe. https://t.co/yFfdjRparW

— Jack Del Rio (@coachdelrio) January 17, 2021

@AlbertBreer we should change bad rules. The competition committee looks at rule changes every year. Maybe this occurrence during a huge divisional game will help it be reviewed as it should be ….and ultimately changed. https://t.co/loCeiu1HqR

— Jack Del Rio (@coachdelrio) January 17, 2021

Rules can be changed, and there is a recent example of a rule change following an egregious pass interference penalty that was not called by the officials in the NFC Championship.

The Sean Payton Rule

Payton, the head coach of the New Orleans Saints and a member of the competition committee, spearheaded a rule change following the 2019 season.

It allows teams to challenge non-pass interference penalties.

Recall that the Saints were robbed of a blatant pass interference penalty in the 2018 NFC Championship against the Los Angeles Rams.

Had Payton been allowed to challenge the lack of a call, the outcome of that game could have changed, sending the Saints to the Super Bowl.

Conclusion

There is documented history of rules being changed as a result of events happening in NFL playoff games.

With that being said, time will tell if this fumble-touchback rule is reevaluated and changed.

Perhaps while they are at it, the competition committee should consider implementing a rule for non-helmet-to-helmet calls also.

Following the lead of the Sean Payton rule, this would give coaches the ability to stop the game to get an obvious penalty play reviewed.

If the NFL is truly concerned about player safety, reviewing non helmet-to-helmet plays should be strongly considered.